Puppeteers of the World: Frank Soehnle

Pierwodruk: Lalkarze świata / Puppeteers of the World: Frank Soehnle, TEATR LALEK 2020, nr 4 (142), ss. 21-26 (wersja polska), ss. 27-32 (English version)

 

 

Frank Soehnle has been conspicuously present on the international theatre circuit for the past quarter of a century, i.e. from the mid-1990s. In 1987 he was one of the first graduates of Studiengang Figurentheater, established four years earlier by Albrecht Roser (and Werner Knoedgen) – a new trend at Staatliche Hochschule für Musik und Darstellende Kunst in Stuttgart, combining the puppet theatre and Materialtheater and Obiekttheater forms, at the time popular in Germany, although Roser was one of the most outstanding marionette puppeteers in Europe. From a time perspective, and after observing over three decades of the careers of the Studiengang Figurentheater graduates it becomes obvious how the idea of a master workshop, intensified at a puppetry academy and subsequently developed independently during years of praxis, passes the test regardless of the sort of technique pursued by the artistic quests of young graduates. The essence will always consist of striving towards animation mastery, which characterises the individuality of the artist-puppeteer.

Upon graduation from the puppetry academy Frank Soehnle was 24 years old, and it will not be an exaggeration to say that his encounter with Albrecht Roser, followed by studying in Stuttgart, moulded his interests, workshop skills, and, ultimately, puppetry style. From the very onset he focused on building the form, testing the material to be used, the technology of the puppet as such, and, subsequently, a gradual discovery of its nature, potential, concealed temperament, and character revealed in the entire creative process. Soehnle was fascinated by marionettes and masks, simultaneous existence “within” the hand built form and, at the same time, an attempt at creating the greatest possible distance towards it, so that “the puppet could shape its personality” – as he recalled years ago in a conversation with Christian Bollow. This ostensible contradiction constitutes the essence of the artistic quests of Frank Soehnle, who admitted that it is the most most exciting part of the creative process, a dialogue of sorts, and co-dependence, somewhat in the manner of life and death. “The fact that I create my puppets myself is of fundamental importance. This is some sort of a strange dance involving observation and a challenging test of strength – manipulation and autonomy”.

The path leading towards the puppetry elite took up only several years. Upon graduation Soehnle first became associated with Figurentheater in Karlsruhe, where he staged six experimental spectacles intended for adults, i.a. Idiot and Kasperl on the Electric Chair (1988–1989), but also productions based on prose by Daniil Kharms or Heiner Müller. This was the onset of separating the literary and visual structure of the stagings, using (alongside the actor) assorted puppet forms (masks, marionettes, paper and latex puppets), experimenting with the word, image, sound, and motion, and searching for stage space other than the traditional one. A time (to 1991) of moulding the Frank Soehnle aesthetics, when together with Karin Ersching he established Figuren Theater Tübingen. The new company was conceived as an itinerant troupe concentrating independent artists and theatres, producing spectacles of its own, and involved in assorted co-productions; eventually, it set up a permanent seat in one of the culture centres in Reutlingen, the capital of the district, situated more than 10 kilometres from Tübingen. From that moment its activity and that of Frank Soehnle was concentrated on four pillars: his solo and textless spectacles; group creations including the participation of invited artists and sometimes – as in the case of the actress Ines Müller-Braunschweig, director Christiane Zanger or musicians from the rat’n’X duo: Stefan Mertin and Johannes Frisch – belonging to Figuren Theater Tübingen; increasingly frequent spectacles with Soehnle as guest director, or his cooperation as a puppeteer upon the occasion of assorted projects initiated by theatre companies across the world; finally, the artist’s pedagogic undertakings at various puppetry academies (Bochum, Stuttgart, Berlin, Charleville-Mézières, Jerusalem) and in the course of scores of international workshops.

In his solo works Soehnle concentrates more on sculpture and motion than on the text and acting, starting with the first premiere given by Figuren Theater Tübingen in 1991: Night Visions or People Beset with the Demons They Deserve, directed by Karin Ersching, Marcus Dürr, and Frank Soehnle. And commemorating the French pre-Surrealist poet Max Jacob, whose texts were totally eliminated in the course of the rehearsals, since the performances of latex puppet forms (table puppets, hand puppets, and marionettes) supported by music performed on stage by rat’n’X proved to be a more powerful theatrical proposal. Relations between the actor and the puppets – phantasmagorical hermaphroditic creatures – describing the life and works of Jacob, a Jewish convert to Catholicism who perished in a concentration camp, shifted the centre of gravity from the animator to his visions and obsessions, producing the impression that he becomes manipulated by puppets. Night Visions was also the first production that thanks to Goethe Institut managed to tour South-East Asia already several months after the premiere and inaugurated Frank Soehnle’s international career.

Successive years witnessed stagings of new spectacles presented by Figuren Theater Tübingen: The World Machine (1992), directed by Christine Schmalor with Soehnle as one of the actors and author of puppets-mannequins, followed a year later by edge. directed by Christiane Zanger, in which the puppeteer Frank Soehnle (naturally, the author of the puppets) accompanied the actress Ines Müller-Braunschweig; in 1994 the same artists staged Rothschild’s Fiddle and Nowhere is Everything Different, addressed to older children and adults, a rarity in the theatre’s repertoire. A number of successive productions, i.a. those co-created by Karin Ersching, exploited to a greater degree means characteristic for the object theatre.

In 1996, five years after his solo premiere, Soehnle showed his second individual production: Flamingo Bar, directed by Hendrik Mannes. This is how he described the sources of inspiration: “A bar in Karlsruhe, with a pink neon sign, provided both the title and inspiration for the spectacle. None of us had ever been inside the bar, which suddenly vanished. Already this fact turned into a catalyst of suppositions and fantasies. The resultant idea led us to a collection of objects (feathers, ventilators, and assorted other findings), texts (Genet, Benjamin, Müller), and music (flamenco performed by Carmen Linares, operas by Sir Henry Purcell, assorted pop music), all connected with the theme of passion, deception, and promise. The created diverse puppet forms were semi-human, semi-animal hybrid creatures, obviously deprived of gender features”. The rest assumed form in the course of rehearsals. Flamingo Bar – Soehnle stated – “is a mute sketch, in which the audience is invited to participate in the process of creation”. The spectacle combined elements of the dance, the theatre, and variétés, “with two main sections dealing with death and seduction, interrupted by two satirical interludes depicting a visit to the opera, together with a puppet dog”. The flirty female dog, with only an elongated muzzle and a costume-fabric concealing Soehnle’s hand, performs, i.a. Tosca’s death scene from the Puccini opera, while charming and seducing the animator. One of constant motifs appearing in the artist’s oeuvre: life and death, this time in a melodramatic version but also a theatrical one, a true masterpiece. Flamingo Bar is full of such imagery. I still recall a curious semi-human marionette sitting alone in the centre of the stage and animated by Soehnle manipulating threads attached to the right side wall of the stage window. A case of brilliant “remote” animation conducted from a distance, with the puppet appearing to be set into motion as if by its own energy. (In subsequent years quite a few puppeteers applied this conception in their auteur spectacles). Another original creature – a four-fingered hybrid-bird (all of Frank Soehnle’s marionettes have unnaturally elongated four fingers), with a peacock feather plume attached to its lumber spine, attempts to reach the crosspiece on which it is suspended so as to snap the threads and set itself free, to regain liberty and “real” life. Two extraordinary female dancers with elongated limbs and holding fans perform a magnetic, brilliantly synchronised dance as if in a mirror. Truly, every puppet conceived by Frank Soehnle and appearing on stage is simultaneously an intriguing work of art, an unusual instrument, and an element of an interpretation puzzle provoking imagination and intellect alike.

Flamingo Bar consolidated Frank Soehnle’s international position, uniqueness, and originality. As a graduate of the Albrecht Roser marionette school he accomplished a true revolution in conceiving and applying this technique by showing its entirely different aspect. His puppets have nothing in common with the emulation of man, for centuries obligatory in this particular technique. They are human-animal hybrids, products of the artist’s imagination, exaggeratedly elongated, and in their way ghastly, wrinkled, bony, and cadaverous, with proportions resembling sculptures by Alberto Giacometti, albeit granted a great variety of details, with almost always elongated hands, a decidedly greater animation potential than that of the classic marionette and, above all, captivating and beautiful just like images of death, temptation, any variety of sin, or illusion. The Soehnle marionette is, at the same time, a vehicle of sorts. It can change its form and disintegrate into smaller elements, while simultaneously turning into an entirely different puppet endowed with a technical, interpretation, and animation potential, as can be seen in the artist’s successive spectacles, to mention With Enormous Wings (2003–2008), based on prose by Gabriel García Márquez and co-directed by Enno Podehl; here, use is made of a kaleidoscope of puppetry potential, including fascinating forms filled with water, animated on thick cords attached to permanent blocks suspended on stage barrels. Other examples include Termitropolis (2004) or salto.lamento (2006).

Flamingo Bar was also the first Frank Soehnle spectacle with which Figuren Theater Tübingen appeared in Poland at the Łódź festival of solo puppeteers (2003). Three years earlier Soehnle showed in Poland Exit. A Hamlet Fantasy, a diploma staging (1997) by Michael Vogel, Soehnle’s student from the Stuttgart academy. From the 1990s, Soehnle directed numerous productions chiefly in Germany. Each season featured two-three spectacles – the outcome of his cooperation with European puppeteers: Christoph Bochdansky, Michael Vogel, Vanessa Valk, Damiet van Dalsum. These were almost never stagings of dramas; frequently nonverbal, they were inspired by assorted texts: Hrabal, Brecht, Shakespeare, Maeterlinck, Gertrude Stein, Cocteau, Borges, Bruno Schulz, Lorca, Kleist, Cervantes, and Giacometti. Soehnle appears as a director also in large institutional puppet theatres in Magdeburg and Frankfurt an der Oder, and, naturally, in puppet academies with which he cooperates, and even in Komische Oper in Berlin. His directing undertakings – a total of several scores – for which he personally prepares or designs the puppets deserve to be discussed separately.

In 2008 the artist met the ensemble of Białostocki Teatr Lalek. Up to then his staging of Sklepy cynamonowe (The Cinnamon Shops) by Schulz was Soehnle’s only work – both fascinating and extremely difficult – prepared in Poland. “Whoever dares to be an independent artist in an institutional theatre – Soehnle recalled this realisation – requires patience and lots of pull. In particular, however, he needs love for the theatre and the people creating it. Upon numerous occasions the artist succumbs to solitariness (…). I willingly compare the process of directing with that of animating a marionette: it involves guidance and a simultaneous pursuing a path. The director holds all the threads while at the same time following all the impulses of the ensemble, technology, music, and text; sometimes the entire theatre heeds that single minimal motion of a tiny puppet. (…) The outcome of the work was an open house with dark corners and evil glances, incomprehensible commentaries and joyful meetings. (…) Inanimate matter does not exist”. Although Sklepy cynamonowe inspired numerous favourable reviews and attracted many fans it also proved that Polish actors-puppeteers are not ready (also today) to pursue a path delineated by the masters of puppetry. We still yearn to be excessively actor-like, and by not creating puppets with our own hands we remain incapable of keeping up with their potential.

The absence of a language barrier certainly facilitated Frank Soehnle’s cooperation with German actors-puppeteers, as exemplified by Theater des Lachens in Frankfurt, in which Soehnle enjoyed great success while staging: Kleist – On the Marionette Theatre or How to Overcome Gravity in Three Acts, winner of prizes granted in Poland (Poznań, 2011 and Łomża, 2013), or Don Quixote – A Dream Game based on Telemann, which received the Grand Prix in Łomża (2014). Nonetheless, work conducted in a studio of his own, together with a team of partners, unquestionably guarantees every artist the greatest possible comfort.

Frank Soehnle appeared on stage as puppeteer and partner of the actress Ines Müller-Braunschweig already in earlier productions featured by Figuren Theater Tübingen. Clearly, he finds this form of relation between an actor and a puppeteer, preserving the independence of the professions without becoming involved in a mutual dialogue, but, at the same time, creating a new literary-visual context for the spectator, much more to his liking; more, he was to return to it. In 2000 Soehnle staged together with the Israeli actor Yehuda Almagor, in a co-production with TEATRON theatre, an acclaimed spectacle: Children of the Beast, based on a novel by David Grossman: See Entry: Love. A multi-level reflection evoking the Holocaust, but also contemporary victim-perpetrator relations seen through the eyes of a child. Almagor, spinning the narrative, was accompanied by Soehnle-animator of puppets: table puppets, masks and, naturally, marionettes.

“The outcome” – wrote one of the German reviewers – “is a stage venture located between dream and reality, in which people turn into marionettes, and marionettes – into people, a work of profound sadness that, however, does not succumb to the latter but seeks comfort – in narration. (…) Almagor and Soehnle create a theatre that evades all categories. (…) A phantom undertaking, but one that demonstrates what the theatre is capable of”.

Soehnle referred to a similar principle, i.e. partnership involving the puppeteer and the live actor, in a co-production shown by his theatre, this time (2011) together with the French Compagnie Bagages de Sable and the Swiss Theater Stadelhofen from Zurich, featuring the French actor Patrick Michaelis in Hôtel de Rive – Giacometti’s Horizontal Time. The spectacle, based on three Surrealistic texts by Alberto Giacometti and inspired by the author’s sculptures and sketches, is a sui generis visual poem about the Italian artist whose “work is the starting point, like trails, which leads to a new place. An invisible place appears where visual and performing arts unite with literature”.

A particularly captivating feature of the Frank Soehnle oeuvre appears to be his interest in aesthetics, the theory of puppetry, reflection about matter and its relations with man. This is probably the main theme of all his quests, experiments associated with new material, novel technological solutions, and the equally new artistic shape of his works. The source of inspirations is, on the one hand, literature, Kleist, Schulz, or Giacometti, and, on the other hand, registered images, topics, and events transposed by the artist’s incredible imagination, which in every situation attempts to breathe life into inanimate objects. This was so in the case of Liquid Skin (2005), an unusual undertaking realised together with the Australian Igneous Group, and shown not quite a year later at the Bielsko-Biała festival. The Australian ensemble was composed of Suzon Fuks and dancer-choreographer James Cunningham, who as a result of a motorcycle accident had lost his left arm but with the assistance of assorted prosthetics managed to create a specific language of motion in the non-existent limb. The fascination with objects, shared by dancer and puppeteer, was truly unlimited, setting imagination into motion and encouraging them to embark upon the theme of bringing an inanimate form to life. For Frank Soehnle this was a successive encounter with a representative of another discipline of the arts – this time a dancer whom animated, transparent Plexiglas forms of puppets, masks, and body parts (pars pro toto) allowed to mould an awareness of his body. Suzon Fuks, responsible for the direction and the video, placed on the stage a pool full of water, with the dancer inside – real and abstract objects appeared and vanished around him. The rhythm of the spectacle was marked by ice masks melting in real time. The number of variations and mutual relations between the constructed images, and incessant balancing on the borderline between life and death, the animate and the inanimate designated successive interpretation proposals.

Quite possibly the chef d’oeuvre in heretofore works by Frank Soehnle is his salto.lamento or the Nocturnal Side of Affairs, directed in 2006 by Enno Podehl, Karin Ersching, and Frank Soehnle, a production naturally featuring his puppets and performed by him on stage. In this successive solo spectacle Soehnle is accompanied by musicians from the rat’n’X duo: Johannes Frisch and Stefan Mertin, cooperating with his theatre from very onset but now actually live on stage and comprising a puppet-musical trio. salto.lamento was inspired by mediaeval iconography depicting the Dance of the Dead, images of death changing across centuries, musical fascinations, and the poetry of Rainer Maria Rilke. Frank Soehnle, who often undertakes the effort of defining the essence of his spectacles, wrote in the programme: “Work on the project at present entitled salto.lamento began with seven poems and seven pieces of fabric. From the very onset music was a decisive component. The mediaeval Dances of Death suggested possible forms and events. The puppets, originally conceived as seven separate portraits, began to build interpersonal relations, a fact that seemed to be worth exploiting. The original dramaturgy of the Dance of Death developed and created space for assorted metamorphoses. Nonetheless, the fundamental theme of the Dance of Death was retained. The music, the ambience, the mood, and the motion of the figures, slowly but steadily progressing, assumed a dynamic of their own. (…) At the same time, the whole composition has its visual, musical, and theatrical sense; it is a visual poem, a musical vision, and the outcome of theatrical quests”.

In the wake of the Polish premiere of salto.lamento at the festival held in Bielsko-Biała in 2008 Halina Waszkiel wrote in “Teatr Lalek”: “Assorted inspirations have been transformed and theatrically expressed with the aid of measures not only appropriate for the puppet theatre but upon each occasion created anew. The figures devised and animated by the brilliant puppeteer possess a moving guise. Their aptitude, gestures and motions are not of this world. Manipulated, they resemble neither man nor animal, but are creatures that merge shapes from the world familiar to us (including those of skeletons and corpses) and one of mysteries. Death appeared to be the most ‘human’ of all – a splendid lady in a tulle dress and an enormous white hat, displaying long earrings decorating her skull and lavish bracelets on the bare bones of her arms. Stirring music, played on stage by the rat’n’X duo (saxophone and double bass), supplies the rhythm and brings the stage figures to life, while they, in turn, force the manipulator to grant them, if even for a moment, a fleeting existence that they had once lost. The artist does not revel in the decay of death – on the contrary, with a virtuosity befitting a great master of animation, he bestows life, allows each of the forms to speak for itself, and at times even makes fun of death (for example, in the scene when a tiny skeleton with a jaw gaping in a wide smile walks about with a dustpan to tidy up, in an apparent travesty of a poem by Szymborska: ‘After every war someone must clean up’)”.

salto.lamento is no longer part of the repertoire of Figuren Theater Tübingen. Together with numerous other works by Frank Soehnle and his partners it is now part of the history of world puppetry, although it could be exploited for years to come. Spectacles by Frank Soehnle do not age – they deal with universal themes and, first and foremost, are based on extraordinary visual-technological beauty and the construction of puppets, which the artist sets into motion with masterful virtuosity. New works continue to emerge: Wunderkammer! (2013), a display of puppetry experiments performed by Alice Therese Gottschalk, Raphael Mürle, and Frank Soehnle, and Nachtkonzert – Le Grand Pas de Deux (2015), a puppet-music duo of Frank Soehnle (puppets) and Jesper Ulfenstedt (double bass) unter.wasser – farewell party (2016), probably Soehnle’s the last directing work at Figuren Theater Tübingen.

Today Frank Soehnle is indubitably one of the masters of world puppetry. Increasingly often he shares his talent and experience with younger generations, and still continues his pursuits. Cooperation with him is an exceptional pleasure and a life lesson.

 

Photos: Figuren Theater Tübingen

 

 

Puppeteers of the World: Duda Paiva

 

 

Pierwodruk: Marek Waszkiel, Lalkarze świata / Puppeteers of the World: Duda Paiva, TEATR LALEK 2021, nr 1 (143), ss. 7-12.

 

 

During the most recent decades the path followed by numerous puppeteers in pursuit of their profession involves puppetry courses at universities, albeit this is only one of the available opportunities. In Central Europe this course remained basically fundamental from the time when 70 years ago – in response to the increasingly dense network of professional permanent theatres – pertinent schooling began to develop together with distinctly profiled specialities: acting, directing-playwriting, stage design, and technology. Across the world numerous artists still continue to discover puppets in different ways – by practising other disciplines of the arts, participating in various workshops, meeting masters of puppetry, and slowly building a world of their own by taking into account diverse aspects of the functioning of the art in question and then one day deciding that the art of puppetry corresponds to their anticipations best of all. To be a puppeteer entails a choice and not chance.

This was the path traversed by Duda Paiva (real name: Eduardo de Paiva Souza), born during the early 1970s. The Brazilian performer, dancer, and, today, predominantly, puppeteer, choreographer, and director started dancing as a 14-year old in his hometown of Goiânia, i.a. at Quasar Cia de Dança, where he embarked upon stage praxis and become acquainted with behind the scenes aspects of theatrical life. As a young artist Paiva set off around the world, i.a. to India and Japan. In Tokyo he studied Butoh dance under the supervision of the celebrated Kazuo Ohno. Paiva hoped to achieve more, to become familiar with new techniques and new partners, and to expand his reflections. Nonetheless, already then he cherished a certain thought, which he once shared in a private conversation. He grew tired of lifting female partners in the course of dance spectacles and instead took a closer look at the props appearing in productions (a table or a chair) and longed to perform with them on stage. In 1996 Paiva arrived in Amsterdam, where he continues to reside and work, and from 2004 conducts his Dutch Duda Paiva Company. Here he not only made the acquaintance of the attractive dance theatre but also discovered puppetry.

In 1997 working with the dancer and choreographer Itzik Galili and the Gertrude Theatre Company on a dance-puppet spectacle, that never premiered, inaugurated Paiva’s passion for puppetry. This was the time of the origin of the Porshia la Belle puppet, which took over the artist’s imagination and up to this very day is present in his programmes. Paiva insisted that his dance with Porshia should be perfect. Soon, he created a puppet show of his own – Loot (1998), and then, together with Mischa van Dullemen, a successive spectacle – Marvin (2000), followed by Dead Orange Walk, staged together with Ulrike Quade (subsequently, author of the Angel puppet), and set off on a path spanning from dancer to independent theatrical artist.

“In this period” – as he mentions his beginnings on the website – “I learned the basics of crafts, which I later personalized and called The Object Score. But still… I didn’t understand why working with the puppet touched me so much. Because it really touched me. (…) I felt at ease using my body to express myself. Now working with a puppet meant I had to give my life to another being. This intrigued me, although I didn’t know why. Until one day, when I put my hand in Porshia’s neck, it struck me that I suddenly recognized a feeling from years ago. Touching the neck brought me back to my youth as I struggled with severe eye infections causing temporary blindness. It was at this time that I held my brother by the back of his neck, letting him guide me through the streets of our hometown. Inserting my hand in Porshia’s neck took me back to this feeling of trust, of being guided and connected to someone else. From that moment on I started to realize that by connecting myself with a puppet I could bring a separate energy alive. When I was young I had let my brother become my eyes to the world, now I started to see the world through the eyes of a puppet. Thus, I entered a whole new, magical world. It is exactly this world that I want to open up for my audience and that I want to teach my students to create too.

The revelation of giving life to another entity became the thriving source of inspiration in my work with puppets. From that moment on, I started to address the puppet as a separate entity that I could use to extend my own body. Overtime I developed and perfected my artistic signature. In various shows I worked with different kinds of puppets. Puppets like Porshia, whom I lend a part of my body, I call Siamese puppets or Hybrids. Besides them, I work with full-size puppets on different scales. I work with puppets that are fairly illustrative and real and I work with puppets that are more abstract in their complexion. Small puppets, big puppets. Full body puppets and puppet-parts, consisting of only a head or a hand. Mostly, I work with hybrid puppets though, sharing my body (one arm and/or both legs) with the puppet. Their appearance may differ, but all puppets share one thing; the highly flexible material they are made of: foam”.

The first Paiva solo spectacle was Angel (2004), which brought immense international acclaim. The puppet depicting the Angel (just like Porshia) is made of white foam the size of a child, and has something of a cupid and, simultaneously, of a fallen angel (a tombstone figure missing a right hand) about it. The author of the text and the director of Angel (as well as of several successive Paiva spectacles) was Paul Selwyn Norton, dancer, choreographer, and director, whom Duda Paiva met earlier upon numerous occasions in assorted dance spectacles. Paiva was the initiator of the entire undertaking and its brilliant executor. In Angel, it was probably the first time that a dancer has met a puppeteer in such a dimension. At any rate, the sheer power of the contemporary dance, the physical theatre, the art of animation, brilliant dialogues delivered by the characters, and direct relations between the actor, the puppet, and the audience had never before been expressed in such an attractive manner.

In the course of the dance and the animation a wandering vagabond (Paiva) comes across a fallen angel (a puppet) – together, they create a world of their own, based on love and hatred, generating interchangeably some sort of an imaginary cosmos together with elements of reality, in which the protagonists are both independent and fused. Sometimes we cannot surmise who is actually steering whom on stage. This is a case of a virtuoso acting-dancing-animating venture! Fundamental impact on Paiva’s acting skills was probably exerted by Neville Tranter, under whose experienced gaze he learned animation and who acted as his puppetry master (and even director) also in consecutive solo spectacles: Morningstar (2006) and Malediction (2008).

The second spectacle often turns out to be the more difficult one. After initial success everyone would like to maintain its level and even attain a higher one. “In Morningstar, just like in Angel, there are only two characters: the animator and the puppet” – Halina Waszkiel wrote – “but their relationship is even closer than in Angel. A strange creature with horns (a devil?), a pig’s snout and droopy ears possesses a single hand, a pot belly, and emphasized details of male anatomy, but no legs. In the course of becoming mutually acquainted it becomes one with the animator – the resultant dual creature has a single pair of legs. It grows, until it finally becomes a head taller than the animator. The originally inarticulate squeaks become resolute orders issued in a low masculine voice. A mutual trial of strength is interrupted by moments of accord, if only the sharing of a cigarette”[1].

Angel was a spectacle about the specific mysteries of love, at time difficult but, nonetheless, victorious. Morningstar entered the sphere of demonism, emerging evil, which becomes necessary to tackle. The initially likeable small form of the foam puppet portraying the devil changed into a monstrous figure. Next, Paiva entered it by pulling this form onto his legs and as if becoming one with the animant, while at the same time demonstrating an enormous and totally new spectre of animation skills. And although Morningstar was not on par with Angel it indicated the puppetry personality of Duda Paiva, who from that time became recognisable via his puppets and the manner of coexisting with them on stage.

In 2007 Duda Paiva directed his first spectacle: Façade, at Białostocki Teatr Lalek. This was an exceptional undertaking both owing to his earlier experience, the character of the production, and the enormous group of performers whom he wished to have in his ensemble. At the time Paiva employed 14 puppeteers, actors, dancers, musicians, and even an opera singer, all originating from various countries. True, he had already devoted several years to working in the puppet theatre as well as to his own shows, but up to then he appeared in solo spectacles and benefited from assistance rendered by invited directors. Façade was Paiva’s debut as director (he cooperated with Paul Selwyn Norton). More, he appeared in it. The rehearsals focused on extraordinary work with the puppet, at the time still almost unknown and made of flexible, strong, and lightweight foam. The actors entered into a process which they had never encountered previously. No literary text or reading rehearsals – everything came into being by concentrating on work with the puppets and slowly created stage situations based on music, songs, and improvised text.

The spectacle was a curious and grotesque impression tinted with black humour and inspired by Venetian townhomes featuring gargoyles (puppets) guarding the entrances. One such house is inhabited by an old woman (a puppet) with a complicated past, who rents rooms. In the end scene “the tenderness, which despite initial animosity the hideous crone and the drunkard-vagabond, banished by everyone, managed to demonstrate to each other touches a tender chord. The actor plays his part while simultaneously animating the puppet portraying the old hag – in this manner the scene is transferred from the domain of literalness to a metaphorical level. Animation signifies bringing to life. The old woman lives as long as she is enlivened by the compassion and empathy shown by the tramp. Her physical ugliness vanishes once emotions come to the fore. On the other hand, only a puppet is capable of showing the social outcast a modicum of sympathy and support…”[2].

An extraordinary impression was made by all the puppets appearing in this spectacle: such as the Boy, invisibly passed by his parents-actors from one to the other, and, in particular, by virtuoso scenes involving the Fat Lady puppet. Her very appearance “first produces laughter followed by admiration for the expression opportunities resulting from animation, and then profound emotional impact once her presence on stage comes to an end. The glance cast by the puppet at the audience while she resists the actor’s exit from her stout spongy body because she does not want to return to her motionless non-existence, causes shivers”[3].

Façade drew attention to the young director, already enjoying the deserved renown of an excellent dancer and, simultaneously, puppeteer. Invitations from other countries rained down. Without resigning from his spectacles, which he continued to prepare regularly, in 2009 Paiva realised, often in co-production with his own company: Clouds (Iran), Hamlet Cannot Sleep (The Netherlands), and Love Dolls (Ljubljana, Slovenia); in 2010: Screaming Object (São Paulo, Brazil), and Detox the Dummy (Tallinn, Estonia); in 2012: Holly (Sofia, Bulgaria); in 2014: Marvin (Ostrava, Czech Republic), The Garden (Saarbrücken, Germany), and The Greeks (Rotterdam, The Netherlands); in 2016: Opowieści z niepamięci (Stories from the Oblivion, Poznań); and in 2017: Golden Horse (Riga, Latvia)[4]. Recent years witnessed successive realisations directed by Paiva mainly as co-productions with Dutch theatres: Monsters, The Fairy Queen, Sail – The Storm Called Life, and DingDong.

By means of his spectacles, to which he invited outside directors, and productions realised together with other companies Duda Paiva established his specific style, built a unique language, and captivated young puppeteers from all over the world. In time he began to devote growing attention to the latter, and increasingly conducted workshops and training sessions upon the occasion of assorted puppetry festivals or puppetry courses held in theatre academies. Meetings with Paiva left a profound trace upon young artists, inspiring them to pursue their quests. I shall not veer from the truth when I write that quite a few young artists started to believe in the sense of dealing with puppetry precisely under the impact of contact with Duda Paiva or even brief periods of working with him.

In each successive spectacle Duda Paiva expanded his search associated with the actor-puppet relation. In the case of Malediction, directed by Neville Tranter, he invited a dance partner to cooperate. This function was fulfilled interchangeably by Ederson R. Xavier, Javier Murugarren or Ilija Surla. The presence of two performers multiplied the staging possibilities. Even though Paiva himself interpreted Malediction as “the fight of two men against the green monster of envy, hate and competition that stands between them. They create a world of fairy tales and nightmares in the hope that they can find a true connection”[5], critics – representing an extremely divided assessment of the spectacle – indicated many other possible interpretations: from a sombre reflection about the contemporary world of medical experiments and genetic manipulations resulting in degeneration and confusion of orders, to intriguing analyses of the murky image of anti-feminist deviations[6].

Regardless of the spectators’ reaction to interpretations of the spectacle, its theatrical form gave rise to enormous interest. Young critics attending the festival held in Bielsko-Biała (2010) awarded the production in question “for the distinctness of theatrical language”. True, no one before had used such language in global puppetry. On the stage we watch a puppet depicting a large green, naked female monster with the face of a witch, subjected to ingenious animations, numerous exchanges of particular parts of her body and fragmentations, and even to giving birth. This form collides with assorted motifs borrowed from fairy tales and making an unexpected appearance, such as a frog’s head magically emerging from a foam ball, or a gigantic hand attacking the dancer who, at the same time, animates it. Outright bewildering dance-animation virtuosity.

It was probably in Malediction that Paiva introduced elements of puppetry magic into his spectacles. This is also the effect of a perfect identification of the material out of which he builds his stage protagonists. Flexible foam used for creating the puppets, devoid of any sort of seams or binders (here the process of sculpting takes place entirely within a single solid of material), can be rolled into small bundle (even the monstrously Fat Lady from Façade can be transported in a plastic shopping bag). A properly rolled up puppet, suitably held on stage, is the reason why air penetrating the interior pushes the foam out and reveals the form’s original sculpted shape. Thus in Malediction the head of a frog materialises from a small foam solid, in Bastard! the same happens in the case of a sought cat, and in Opowieści z niepamięci (Stories from the Oblivion)– of Baby puppet, to mention just a few examples. In the manner of the former masters of the puppet theatre Duda Paiva does not neglect to cast a spell on his spectators. And accomplishes this feat brilliantly.

The aforementioned Bastard! (2010) is one of Paiva’s best productions – a successive solo spectacle and a free adaptation of L’Arrache-coeur (Heartsnatcher), the satirical and surrealistic novel by Boris Vian. This is a story about a confused artist attempting to discover a way out of the rubble of existence portrayed as a gigantic refuse dump ruled by a grotesque and legless hag (a puppet) and her heart-breaking emaciated puppet partner clad only in his underpants. The already legendary scene of the dance performed by Paiva and the crone, with whom the actor shares his legs, is equalled by many other episodes, in particular the improbable simultaneous animation of both puppets, which, together with the animator, perform a truly masterly dance on the metal construction of a cuboid, involving the diverse motion of three characters. From the time of Bastard! Paiva’s spectacles feature yet another prominent partner – the playwright. Originally, this function was fulfilled by the Slovenian director Jaka Ivanc in Bestiaires (2011/2012) – a virtuoso show based on motifs from the Greek myths and realised with two casts: Dutch and Norwegian, or in Break a Legend – a spectacle commemorating the tenth anniversary of the Duda Paiva Company and featuring Paiva puppets from different productions. Bestiaires was a consecutive féerie of made-up puppets, including ones impossible to ignore, such as the head of Zeus, the three-headed Cerberus guarding the Underworld, or the stunning Medusa. The playwright of the most recent Paiva productions and projects is Kim Kooijman, author of excellent photographs of the spectacles.

An exceptionally personal Duda Paiva solo spectacle was Blind (2015), a sui generis metaphorical transposition of reminiscences from the artist’s childhood, when he battled numerous illnesses, an ulcerated body, and temporary blindness. Just as in Screaming Object, puppet forms – initially invisible and concealed underneath the costume – in the shape of assorted gradually revealed growths on the body, interact with the animator and the audience. Blind was performed interchangeably by Paiva and the dancer Ilija Surla, with whom the former cooperated upon numerous occasions.

From the time of the 2019 premiere of his last solo work: Joe 5 – Duets about Humanity and Its Absence, which Duda Paiva prepared and presented at the Charleville-Mézières festival, he made way for younger dancers. Today, Joe 5 is enacted by Ilija Surla or Josse Vessies. In this story a dystopian world designed by an extraterrestrial Martian system is reached by successive versions of neo-human explorers of the Cosmos. From the opening scene we recognise the Duda Paiva style, but once again his puppets differ from those appearing in Bastard!, Opowieści z niepamięci, or Golden Horse, to evoke examples familiar to the Polish audience. They are just as fascinating and futuristic as the stage space and lights designed by STMSND Theatre Collective from Amersfoort, the latter location being also the seat of the Duda Paiva Company.

For years Duda Paiva, who is today concentrating much more on cooperation with young artists or companies, and dedicated mainly to conceiving spectacles, directing, and puppet construction, has been engaged in popularising his work method, which some time ago he called The Object Score. As he himself puts it:“The choreography of two (or more) bodies driven by one brain”. The method in question allows the dancer/actor to explore the dialogue involving the artist and the puppet by creating a dual dance style engaging man and object. “My work starts with a fascination for movement. Animating space and time. I believe our body is more than a combination of cells and atoms; they are filled with memories. We are full of stories” – Paiva declared in 2020. – “(…) Some of those stories are unconsciously anchored in us. They only come out when the body starts to move. (…) How do you get access to the memories that lie within us? That intrigues me. The body as a source of unlimited knowledge and history. In my work I ask myself how, with the help of moving bodies, I can make clear what it means to be human. Who are we in the depths of our being? My sculptures play an important role in this. Their flexible forms show the external characteristics of the human body and transcend them at the same time. They are naturally neutral beings that I fill with stories of humanity. As soon as a pop enters the stage, she immediately catches the attention of the audience. And: she can make anything. After all, nobody condemns a doll when it deviates from the norm. A puppet has no ego. She is. We watch her and hear her story. Without prejudices. A puppet is gender / culture / religion / sexual preference-neutral. A quality that makes it possible to discuss taboos in a light-hearted way”. And to conduct a dialogue with the audience. “As a modern dancer I missed the connection with the audience. That was in the dark looking at the story I told with my body. But no dialogue started. Until I entered the stage with Porshia. The wall that separated me and the audience naturally fell away”.

“Puppetry gave me an important lesson” – Paiva stated in the only interview published in Poland. – “It taught me humility. A puppet is a kind of a ‘memory box’ that we build, create. It is most interesting and most revolutionary that one is able to create a different kind of body, to build a creature and dialogue with it, ask questions, observe, go with it step by step, ‘read’ it as a book. And finally he summed up: I am a servant of a puppet. It is me that serves puppets, not the other way round”[7].

 

 

[1] Halina Waszkiel, Tańczący z lalkami, “Teatr” 2012, no. 4. [2] Ibidem. [3] Ibidem. [4] Review from this spectacle in: “Teatr Lalek” 2018, no. 1. [5] Duda Paiva Company: Malediction, [online], [acessed: 17.12.2020], available on: https://dudapaiva.com/en/project/malediction/. [6] See: i.a. Halina Waszkiel, Ropuchowata kobiecość, czyli „Przekleństwo” Dudy Paivy, “Teatr” 2010, no. 10. [7] Służę lalkom. Duda Paiva Talks with Halina Waszkiel, “Teatr” 2017, no. 3.

Photos by Sjoerd Derine, Jaka Ivanc, Bogumił Gudalewski, Jakub Witchen

Kontakt
close slider


    Marek Waszkiel

    Będzie mi miło, jeśli do mnie napiszesz:

    Polityka prywatności

    You cannot copy content of this page